AMIT KUMAR @ AMIT KUMAR SWAIN vs STATE OF ORISSA — CRLMC/593/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

CNR: ODHC010127032026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRLMC/5384/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

CRLMC/593/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Judge

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Coram

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

AMIT KUMAR @ AMIT KUMAR SWAIN

Adv. JUGALA KISHORE PANDA,P.R.SINGH,P.R.SINGH, P.R.SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ORISSA

Hearing History

Judge: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

23-02-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C / 528 BNSS.

09-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - ADJOURNED MATTERS

09-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - ADJOURNED MATTERS

25-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - ADJOURNED MATTERS

10-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - ADJOURNED MATTERS

Orders

09-04-2026
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Summary The High Court of Orissa directed the Investigating Officer in EOW P.S. Case No.14 of 2021 to expedite and complete the investigation as early as possible, recognizing that the 5-year delay in a fraud case involving alleged impersonation of IAS/RAW officials and wrongful inducement of ₹1.17 crore was causing undue harassment to the petitioner. The court, while not expressing opinion on case merits, emphasized that prolonged investigation without justification violates the right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution and must be concluded promptly to facilitate trial commencement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa directed the Investigating Officer in EOW P.S. Case No.14 of 2021 to expedite and complete the investigation as early as possible, recognizing that the 5-year delay in a fraud case involving alleged impersonation of IAS/RAW officials and wrongful inducement of ₹1.17 crore was causing undue harassment to the petitioner. The court, while not expressing opinion on case merits, emphasized that prolonged investigation without justification violates the right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution and must be concluded promptly to facilitate trial commencement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case