RAJENDRA PRASAD MOHANTY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/5863/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: ODHC010124862026
Filing Number
WP(C)/7162/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/5863/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Coram
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )
Sub-Category
ORISSA SURVEY SETTLEMENT ACT 1958 ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJENDRA PRASAD MOHANTY
Adv. BIJOY DASMOHAPATRA,B.N.BHOL,B.N.BHOL, B.N.BHOL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.TAHASILDAR, BHUBANESWAR
-
3.SETTLEMENT OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE MAJOR SETTLEMENT, CUTTACK
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF
Summary: In this High Court of Orissa writ petition concerning a land property dispute, the Court adjourned the case for further hearing scheduled in the week of 04.05.2026. The Court kept the question of maintainability and the Assistant Settlement Officer's jurisdiction open for argument at the final hearing stage, while issuing notice to the opposite parties. The State's submission regarding alternative remedy under Section 15(b) of the Odisha Survey and Settlement Act, 1958 was noted but the jurisdictional issue raised by the petitioner's counsel was deemed significant enough to proceed with the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/5863/2026
Summary: In this High Court of Orissa writ petition concerning a land property dispute, the Court adjourned the case for further hearing scheduled in the week of 04.05.2026. The Court kept the question of maintainability and the Assistant Settlement Officer's jurisdiction open for argument at the final hearing stage, while issuing notice to the opposite parties. The State's submission regarding alternative remedy under Section 15(b) of the Odisha Survey and Settlement Act, 1958 was noted but the jurisdictional issue raised by the petitioner's counsel was deemed significant enough to proceed with the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts