SUMANTA KUMAR NAYAK vs THE STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC/598/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CNR: ODHC010122132026
Filing Number
CRLMC/5187/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLMC/598/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Judge
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
Coram
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMANTA KUMAR NAYAK
Adv. DEVI PRASAD DASH,B.K.MISHRA, B.R.DASH,B.K.MISHRA, B.R.DASH, B.K.MISHRA, B.R.DASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.RINA GHADEI
Adv. NIRANJAN NAYAK
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
For Admission - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C.
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
08-Apr-2026
For Admission - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C.
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
24-Mar-2026
Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted one week's time to Opposite Party No.2 to appear in the matter and adjourned the case to 8th April 2026. As an interim measure, the court directed that the trial court shall grant adjournments on the petitioner's application, considering the petitioner's procrastinating conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission - Adjourned Matters
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
10-Mar-2026
Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission - Adjourned Matters
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
05-Mar-2026
Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C.
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
25-Feb-2026
Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLMC/598/2026
Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted one week's time to Opposite Party No.2 to appear in the matter and adjourned the case to 8th April 2026. As an interim measure, the court directed that the trial court shall grant adjournments on the petitioner's application, considering the petitioner's procrastinating conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts