DR. RABINDRA KUMAR PANDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /6732/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010119862026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

WP(C) /6854/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /6732/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Coram

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

REGULARISATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

DR. RABINDRA KUMAR PANDA

Adv. KURESH PRASAD DASH,P.C.SEJPADA, R.ROUT,P.C.SEJPADA, R.ROUT, P.C.SEJPADA, R.ROUT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT,

DIRECTOR AYUSH DIRECTORATE OF INDIAN MEDICINE AND HOMEOPATHY

INSPECTOR OF HOMEOPATHY, KORAPUT CIRCLE

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E), ODISHA

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

24-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

24-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

The High Court of Orissa disposed of Dr. Rabindra Kumar Panda's writ petition without deciding the merits, directing the State of Odisha to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation (Annexure-10) in accordance with law within three months. The court's decision was based on mutual consent of both parties, with no substantive ruling on the petitioner's claim regarding service period calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of Dr. Rabindra Kumar Panda's writ petition without deciding the merits, directing the State of Odisha to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation (Annexure-10) in accordance with law within three months. The court's decision was based on mutual consent of both parties, with no substantive ruling on the petitioner's claim regarding service period calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case