DR. RABINDRA KUMAR PANDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/6732/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010119862026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/6854/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/6732/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
REGULARISATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. RABINDRA KUMAR PANDA
Adv. KURESH PRASAD DASH,P.C.SEJPADA, R.ROUT,P.C.SEJPADA, R.ROUT, P.C.SEJPADA, R.ROUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
-
3.DIRECTOR AYUSH DIRECTORATE OF INDIAN MEDICINE AND HOMEOPATHY
-
4.INSPECTOR OF HOMEOPATHY, KORAPUT CIRCLE
-
5.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E), ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa disposed of Dr. Rabindra Kumar Panda's writ petition without deciding the merits, directing the State of Odisha to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation (Annexure-10) in accordance with law within three months. The court's decision was based on mutual consent of both parties, with no substantive ruling on the petitioner's claim regarding service period calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/6732/2026
The High Court of Orissa disposed of Dr. Rabindra Kumar Panda's writ petition without deciding the merits, directing the State of Odisha to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation (Annexure-10) in accordance with law within three months. The court's decision was based on mutual consent of both parties, with no substantive ruling on the petitioner's claim regarding service period calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts