ROHAN NAYAK vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/2549/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --Dismissed on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010118802026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/5072/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/2549/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik

Coram

Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHAN NAYAK

    Adv. SULOCHANA PATRO,S.K.MOHANTY, R.SINGH,S.K.MOHANTY, R.SINGH, S.K.MOHANTY, R.SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaikView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed three pre-arrest bail petitions filed by Bikash Nayak, Rohan Nayak, and Bhaskar Nayak under Section 482 BNSS in connection with an assault case. The court found that based on the victim's dying declaration naming the petitioners, medical evidence showing multiple lacerations, witness statements, and investigation materials, the case did not warrant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Adjourned Bail Applications U/S 438 Cr.P.C./ 482 Bnss

    Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaikView PDF

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/2549/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed three pre-arrest bail petitions filed by Bikash Nayak, Rohan Nayak, and Bhaskar Nayak under Section 482 BNSS in connection with an assault case. The court found that based on the victim's dying declaration naming the petitioners, medical evidence showing multiple lacerations, witness statements, and investigation materials, the case did not warrant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case