SANTOSH SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/5148/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010115232026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6589/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/5148/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Coram

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

EVICTION UNDER THE PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION) ACT ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH SAHOO

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SARANGI,P.SARANGI,P.SARANGI, P.SARANGI

  2. 2.PABITRA PANDA

  3. 3.AMULYA KISHORE PANDA

  4. 4.SHYAMSUNDAR NATH

  5. 5.NAROTTAM PRUSTY

  6. 6.BIBHUTI BHUSAN NATH

  7. 7.PREMANANDA SAHU

  8. 8.PURNA CHANDRA SAHOO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR, JAJPUR

  3. 3.TAHASILDAR, RASULPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the petitioners' interim application seeking one month's extension to shift their shops from their present location. The court found no justification for granting further time since the original one-month period had already elapsed and the eviction order, issued by the Tahasildar in October 2025, had been upheld by both appellate and revisional courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/5148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the petitioners' interim application seeking one month's extension to shift their shops from their present location. The court found no justification for granting further time since the original one-month period had already elapsed and the eviction order, issued by the Tahasildar in October 2025, had been upheld by both appellate and revisional courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case