SWETAPADMA SAHOO vs THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT OF ODISHA, KHURDA — WP(C)/5332/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010113662026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6498/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/5332/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWETAPADMA SAHOO

    Adv. SANJAYA KUMAR DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT OF ODISHA, KHURDA

  2. 2.THE TAHASILDAR,JATANI

  3. 3.THE MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, CUTTACK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack disposed of the writ petition filed by Swetapadma Sahoo, who sought a certified copy of land records (Sabik ROR) from the Tahasildar, Jatani. The court allowed the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh application with better particulars, citing subsequent developments that occurred during the petition's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/5332/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack disposed of the writ petition filed by Swetapadma Sahoo, who sought a certified copy of land records (Sabik ROR) from the Tahasildar, Jatani. The court allowed the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh application with better particulars, citing subsequent developments that occurred during the petition's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case