MURALI KHARSEL vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/1424/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010096252026

Filing Number

BLAPL/4189/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/1424/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURALI KHARSEL

    Adv. SABYASACHI MISHRA,P.K.BEHERA,P.K.BEHERA, P.K.BEHERA

  2. 2.LAKHIDHAR MAJHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted bail to petitioners Murali Kharsel and another in a case involving setting up a live electric trap to poach wild boar, which accidentally caused a death. The court found no direct evidence against the petitioners, determined the materials revealed culpable homicide rather than murder, and considered their extended pre-trial custody since August 2025 and the presumption of innocence. The petitioners were admitted to bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/1424/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted bail to petitioners Murali Kharsel and another in a case involving setting up a live electric trap to poach wild boar, which accidentally caused a death. The court found no direct evidence against the petitioners, determined the materials revealed culpable homicide rather than murder, and considered their extended pre-trial custody since August 2025 and the presumption of innocence. The petitioners were admitted to bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case