LEO @ TAPAN @ SUMAN @ SARBESWAR NAYAK vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/1413/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010096032026

Filing Number

BLAPL/4180/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/1413/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 439
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEO @ TAPAN @ SUMAN @ SARBESWAR NAYAK

    Adv. SK. ZAFARULLA,J.KAMILA, S.PATTANAIK,J.KAMILA, S.PATTANAIK, J.KAMILA, S.PATTANAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa partially allowed two consolidated bail applications arising from an attempted murder case involving firearm and sharp weapon attacks. Leo @ Tapan @ Suman @ Sarbeswar Nayak's bail was granted with a Rs. 50,000 bond requirement as he was not identified in the TI parade, while Susil Nayak's bail was rejected due to his alleged identification by a witness and criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/1413/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa partially allowed two consolidated bail applications arising from an attempted murder case involving firearm and sharp weapon attacks. Leo @ Tapan @ Suman @ Sarbeswar Nayak's bail was granted with a Rs. 50,000 bond requirement as he was not identified in the TI parade, while Susil Nayak's bail was rejected due to his alleged identification by a witness and criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case