SATYA RANJAN JENA vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/1393/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010095822026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
BLAPL/4170/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
BLAPL/1393/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATYA RANJAN JENA
Adv. DEEPTIRANJAN JENA,G.R.DHAL,G.R.DHAL, G.R.DHAL
-
2.DEBASIS DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
Summary The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Satya Ranjan Jena and another in an NDPS Act case involving alleged transportation of 22kg of ganja, considering their pre-trial detention and lack of similar criminal antecedents. The petitioners were admitted to bail on furnishing Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties, conditional upon verification that they have no prior NDPS-related convictions, with the bail benefit to be withdrawn if such antecedents are discovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BLAPL/1393/2026
Summary The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Satya Ranjan Jena and another in an NDPS Act case involving alleged transportation of 22kg of ganja, considering their pre-trial detention and lack of similar criminal antecedents. The petitioners were admitted to bail on furnishing Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties, conditional upon verification that they have no prior NDPS-related convictions, with the bail benefit to be withdrawn if such antecedents are discovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts