GOBINDA SANDIL vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/1410/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010094362026

Filing Number

BLAPL/4098/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/1410/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 439

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOBINDA SANDIL

    Adv. SOUMYA RANJAN DAS

  2. 2.BINAYAK MALLICK

  3. 3.ROHIT PATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa granted bail to three petitioners (Gobinda Sandil, Bishnu Tirkey, and Chintu Munda) accused of dacoity-related offences under BNS Sections 310(4)/310(5) and the Arms Act. The court considered the nature of charges, their pre-trial detention since November 2025, and the presumption of innocence, allowing each petitioner bail on furnishing Rs. 50,000 bonds with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/1410/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa granted bail to three petitioners (Gobinda Sandil, Bishnu Tirkey, and Chintu Munda) accused of dacoity-related offences under BNS Sections 310(4)/310(5) and the Arms Act. The court considered the nature of charges, their pre-trial detention since November 2025, and the presumption of innocence, allowing each petitioner bail on furnishing Rs. 50,000 bonds with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case