GAGAN KUMAR SAI @ SAY UMA SHANKAR PATEL, B.K.BARIK, A.PANDA, vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/1444/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010093482026
e-Filing Number
05-02-2026
Filing Number
BLAPL/4066/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
BLAPL/1444/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAGAN KUMAR SAI @ SAY UMA SHANKAR PATEL, B.K.BARIK, A.PANDA,
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Gagan Kumar Sai in a murder case where he allegedly killed Sunil Sunani by slapping him, finding that the medical cause of death was ischemia and ventricular fibrillation rather than the slaps themselves. The court considered the petitioner's prolonged pre-trial custody since September 2025, the presumption of innocence, and the fact that death did not occur at the place of occurrence, and admitted him to bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BLAPL/1444/2026
The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Gagan Kumar Sai in a murder case where he allegedly killed Sunil Sunani by slapping him, finding that the medical cause of death was ischemia and ventricular fibrillation rather than the slaps themselves. The court considered the petitioner's prolonged pre-trial custody since September 2025, the presumption of innocence, and the fact that death did not occur at the place of occurrence, and admitted him to bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts