ROHIT KUMAR SETHY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/4344/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010090372026

Filing Number

WP(C)/5090/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/4344/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

Coram

Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Sub-Category

ORISSA SURVEY SETTLEMENT ACT 1958 ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT KUMAR SETHY

    Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR MALLICK,G.R.MALLICK,G.R.MALLICK, G.R.MALLICK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR, KHURDA

  3. 3.THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER, MAJOR SETTLEMENT OFFICE

  4. 4.THE TAHASILDAR, BHUBANESWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition without deciding the merits, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate revenue authority (Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar) with a proper application for mutation of the disputed land in his favor. The petitioner, who purchased the property through a registered sale deed in 2021 and is in peaceful possession, must file the application through the competent authority rather than via representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/4344/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition without deciding the merits, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate revenue authority (Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar) with a proper application for mutation of the disputed land in his favor. The petitioner, who purchased the property through a registered sale deed in 2021 and is in peaceful possession, must file the application through the competent authority rather than via representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case