RUDRA NARAYAN MISHRA PRATIK NAYAK, A.MISHRA, V.PATTNAYAK, C.PRAKASH vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/1436/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010089652026

Filing Number

BLAPL/3911/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/1436/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUDRA NARAYAN MISHRA PRATIK NAYAK, A.MISHRA, V.PATTNAYAK, C.PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.HEMENDRA PRASAD DASH

    Adv. BIBHUTI RANJAN MOHANTY,B.K.RAJ,S.MOHANTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Orissa High Court rejected the bail application of Rudra Narayan Mishra, a lawyer accused under Section 108 of BNS (abetment of suicide) in connection with a woman's death. The court found prima facie and reasonable allegations against the petitioner, noting the deceased had eight injuries on her body, they were in a live-in relationship, the house CCTV was suspiciously switched off during the incident, and the final forensic opinion on cause of death remained pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/1436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Orissa High Court rejected the bail application of Rudra Narayan Mishra, a lawyer accused under Section 108 of BNS (abetment of suicide) in connection with a woman's death. The court found prima facie and reasonable allegations against the petitioner, noting the deceased had eight injuries on her body, they were in a live-in relationship, the house CCTV was suspiciously switched off during the incident, and the final forensic opinion on cause of death remained pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case