RAJU @ BALARAM NAYAK vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/1325/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010088782026

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

BLAPL/3867/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/1325/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJU @ BALARAM NAYAK

    Adv. APARESH BHOI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa rejected the bail application of Raju @ Balaram Nayak, who was charge-sheeted for throwing battery acid at Jagabandhu Palei causing grievous injury, under BNS sections 109(1), 124(1), and 61(2)(a). The court found the allegations serious and grievous in nature, and considering the gravity of offences and the fact that trial had not yet commenced, denied bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C / 483 Bnss.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/1325/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa rejected the bail application of Raju @ Balaram Nayak, who was charge-sheeted for throwing battery acid at Jagabandhu Palei causing grievous injury, under BNS sections 109(1), 124(1), and 61(2)(a). The court found the allegations serious and grievous in nature, and considering the gravity of offences and the fact that trial had not yet commenced, denied bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case