DILLIP KUMAR PANDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/1676/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010084812026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/3705/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/1676/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik

Coram

Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILLIP KUMAR PANDA

    Adv. SAMARENDRA BAHADUR,S.B.LENKA, B.B.BEHERA, U.K.MALLICK,S.B.LENKA, B.B.BEHERA, U.K.MALLICK, S.B.LENKA, B.B.BEHERA, U.K.MALLICK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaikView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa rejected the petitioner's plea for pre-arrest bail in a rape case but directed him to surrender within a fortnight before the lower court for conditional release on bail. The court found that while the petitioner and informant had been in a consensual relationship that later deteriorated into a family dispute, the allegations warranted bail with conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond, non-harassment of the informant, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 438 Cr.P.C./482 Bnss

    Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaikView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/1676/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa rejected the petitioner's plea for pre-arrest bail in a rape case but directed him to surrender within a fortnight before the lower court for conditional release on bail. The court found that while the petitioner and informant had been in a consensual relationship that later deteriorated into a family dispute, the allegations warranted bail with conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond, non-harassment of the informant, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case