UDIT NARAYAN PRADHAN BHAGABAT PRASAD RATH, R.SAHOO, S.SATAPATHY, N.KAR vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC/565/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010083472026

Filing Number

CRLMC/3649/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLMC/565/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Judge

Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

Coram

Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UDIT NARAYAN PRADHAN BHAGABAT PRASAD RATH, R.SAHOO, S.SATAPATHY, N.KAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.RAJESH SAMANTA SINGHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C.

    Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa quashed the criminal proceedings against petitioner Udit Narayan Pradhan under Section 482 Cr.P.C., finding that continuation would be futile and abuse of process. The complainant and petitioner jointly affirmed the dispute was amicably settled with no realistic chance of conviction, and the court imposed Rs. 15,000 cost on each party for police welfare funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C.

    Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMC/565/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa quashed the criminal proceedings against petitioner Udit Narayan Pradhan under Section 482 Cr.P.C., finding that continuation would be futile and abuse of process. The complainant and petitioner jointly affirmed the dispute was amicably settled with no realistic chance of conviction, and the court imposed Rs. 15,000 cost on each party for police welfare funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case