SAFIUL HUDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/1211/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010080432026
Filing Number
BLAPL/3509/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Registration No
BLAPL/1211/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAFIUL HUDA
Adv. ARIJEET MISHRA,S.K.JENA, S.BISWAL, R.MAHATO, K.P.MUKHI, I.MISHRA,S.K.JENA, S.BISWAL, R.MAHATO, K.P.MUKHI, I.MISHRA, S.K.JENA, S.BISWAL, R.MAHATO, K.P.MUKHI, I.MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa granted bail to three petitioners (Safiul Huda, Khursid Rabbani, and Jamil Aktar) accused of kidnapping and extortion in a ransom case, considering their prolonged pre-trial detention of over one year, lack of identification in TI parade, recovery of substantial ransom money, and absence of witness testimony against them. The court admitted them to bail on furnishing Rs. 1 lakh bond each with sureties, conditioned on verification that they have no criminal antecedents of similar nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C / 483 Bnss.
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
18-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BLAPL/1211/2026
The High Court of Orissa granted bail to three petitioners (Safiul Huda, Khursid Rabbani, and Jamil Aktar) accused of kidnapping and extortion in a ransom case, considering their prolonged pre-trial detention of over one year, lack of identification in TI parade, recovery of substantial ransom money, and absence of witness testimony against them. The court admitted them to bail on furnishing Rs. 1 lakh bond each with sureties, conditioned on verification that they have no criminal antecedents of similar nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts