PRAMOD KUMAR BEHERA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/4015/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010068872026

Filing Number

WP(C)/3851/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/4015/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAMOD KUMAR BEHERA

    Adv. SIVA SANKAR CHAINI,S.K.SAHOO, M.SAHOO, A.MOHANTY,S.K.SAHOO, M.SAHOO, A.MOHANTY, S.K.SAHOO, M.SAHOO, A.MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.TAHASILDAR, TAHASIL OFFICE, BHADRAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition and directed the Tahasildar of Bhadrak to dispose of the pending Demarcation Case No. 121 of 2023 within three months, following the Government of Odisha guidelines dated 13.12.2016, provided no legal impediment exists. The court's decision was made on consent of both parties, addressing the petitioner's grievance regarding inaction by the administrative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/4015/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition and directed the Tahasildar of Bhadrak to dispose of the pending Demarcation Case No. 121 of 2023 within three months, following the Government of Odisha guidelines dated 13.12.2016, provided no legal impediment exists. The court's decision was made on consent of both parties, addressing the petitioner's grievance regarding inaction by the administrative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case