FIROJA KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/1351/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010067032026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
ABLAPL/2926/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
ABLAPL/1351/2026
Registration Date
31-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik
Coram
Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FIROJA KUMAR SAHU
Adv. ABHISHEK DASH,A.MISHRA, P.JAIN,A.MISHRA, P.JAIN, A.MISHRA, P.JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaikView PDF
The High Court of Orissa granted pre-arrest bail to both petitioners (Smruti Ranjan Tripathy and Firoja Kumar Sahu) in a death case involving a company project manager. The court found the death to be suicide by hanging, not homicide, and determined there was no causal nexus between alleged harassment by one accused and the deceased's death. Both petitioners were ordered released on bail of Rs. 30,000 each with a surety, on condition they do not influence material witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 438 Cr.P.C./482 Bnss
Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik
-
09-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaikView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABLAPL/1351/2026
The High Court of Orissa granted pre-arrest bail to both petitioners (Smruti Ranjan Tripathy and Firoja Kumar Sahu) in a death case involving a company project manager. The court found the death to be suicide by hanging, not homicide, and determined there was no causal nexus between alleged harassment by one accused and the deceased's death. Both petitioners were ordered released on bail of Rs. 30,000 each with a surety, on condition they do not influence material witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts