ACHYUTANANDA MAHAKUD vs SUB COLLECTOR CUM SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, DHENKANAL — WP(C)/3597/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010065682026
Filing Number
WP(C)/3704/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/3597/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Coram
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ACHYUTANANDA MAHAKUD
Adv. BRAHMANANDA TRIPATHY,B.TRIPATHY, A.MISHRA, H.BANSAL,B.TRIPATHY, A.MISHRA, H.BANSAL, B.TRIPATHY, A.MISHRA, H.BANSAL
-
2.JUGAL KISHORE MAHAKHUD
-
3.JAGADANANDA MAHAKHUD
-
4.PABITRA MAHAKHUD
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUB COLLECTOR CUM SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, DHENKANAL
-
2.TAHASILDAR,KAMAKHYANAGAR,DHENKANAL
-
3.I.I.C.,TUMUSINGHA POLICE STATITION,DHENKANAL
-
4.HRUSIKESH SASAMAL
-
5.KUNDURU @ NALINI SASAMAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition, finding that implementation of Section 133 CrPC orders has specific statutory procedures already available. The court directed petitioners to file an appropriate application before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate for implementation of the 20.09.2024 order, with a directive that it be disposed of within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/3597/2026
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition, finding that implementation of Section 133 CrPC orders has specific statutory procedures already available. The court directed petitioners to file an appropriate application before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate for implementation of the 20.09.2024 order, with a directive that it be disposed of within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts