MD. JAMIL ANSARI vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/3156/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010054532026

Filing Number

WP(C)/3037/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/3156/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

Coram

Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. JAMIL ANSARI

    Adv. KOUSIK ANANDA GURU,A.K.MOHANTY, G.PATTNAIK, S.CHIMANKA,A.K.MOHANTY, G.PATTNAIK, S.CHIMANKA, A.K.MOHANTY, G.PATTNAIK, S.CHIMANKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR, SAMBALPUR

  3. 3.TAHASILDAR,SADAR,SAMBALPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sashikanta MishraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa directed the Tahsildar, Sambalpur to accept the petitioner's application for mutation of the Record of Rights (ROR), finding no valid reason for its rejection. The Court disposed of the writ petition while clarifying that acceptance of the application does not imply any opinion on the merits of the claim, leaving the substantive examination to be conducted by the Tahsildar in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/3156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa directed the Tahsildar, Sambalpur to accept the petitioner's application for mutation of the Record of Rights (ROR), finding no valid reason for its rejection. The Court disposed of the writ petition while clarifying that acceptance of the application does not imply any opinion on the merits of the claim, leaving the substantive examination to be conducted by the Tahsildar in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case