CHHATISH @ SATISH BARIK vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/812/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010053682026

Filing Number

BLAPL/2369/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/812/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHATISH @ SATISH BARIK

    Adv. DALIRANI BEHURAY,S.BAHADUR, L.BEHURAY,S.BAHADUR, L.BEHURAY, S.BAHADUR, L.BEHURAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Orissa rejected the bail application of Chhatish @ Satish Barik, accused of dacoity involving assault, threat to life, and theft of Rs. 5,00,000. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offences under BNS §310(2) r/w Arms Act §25/27, the petitioner's six prior criminal cases (undisclosed in the application), confession evidence, and pending examination of key witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C / 483 Bnss.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/812/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa rejected the bail application of Chhatish @ Satish Barik, accused of dacoity involving assault, threat to life, and theft of Rs. 5,00,000. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offences under BNS §310(2) r/w Arms Act §25/27, the petitioner's six prior criminal cases (undisclosed in the application), confession evidence, and pending examination of key witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case