PRAKASH CHANDRA PRUSTY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/1929/2023

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: ODHC010050582023

Filing Number

WP(C)/1929/2023

Filing Date

20-Jan-2023

Registration No

WP(C)/1929/2023

Registration Date

24-Jan-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Sub-Category

ORISSA SURVEY SETTLEMENT ACT 1958 ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH CHANDRA PRUSTY

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR SAMANTARAY,S.C.TRIPATHY, N.SAHOO, M.DAS, A.P.MISHRA I.SWAIN,S.C.TRIPATHY, N.SAHOO, M.DAS, A.P.MISHRA I.SWAIN, S.C.TRIPATHY, N.SAHOO, M.DAS, A.P.MISHRA I.SWAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE SUB COLLECTOR,BBSR

  3. 3.THE TAHASILDAR,BBSR

  4. 4.THE LAND OFFICER,BDA

  5. 5.THE REVENUE INSPECTOR,PATRAPADA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    Case Adjourned. The High Court of Orissa found that required documents could not be filed in time, preventing service of notice on Opposite Party No.7. The court directed that filed requisites be used for notice purposes and adjourned the matter for listing after proper service of notice is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1929/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned. The High Court of Orissa found that required documents could not be filed in time, preventing service of notice on Opposite Party No.7. The court directed that filed requisites be used for notice purposes and adjourned the matter for listing after proper service of notice is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case