MD. SALAUDDIN SANDEEP RAJ PANDA, S.MOHAPATRA, R.K.ROUT vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/693/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010045642026

Filing Number

BLAPL/2028/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/693/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. SALAUDDIN SANDEEP RAJ PANDA, S.MOHAPATRA, R.K.ROUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa granted bail to petitioner Md. Salauddin in a cyber fraud case involving unauthorized linking of a bank account ATM card to his mobile device, citing lack of evidence of actual financial loss and his extended pre-trial detention since November 2025. The court admitted him to bail upon furnishing Rs. 50,000 bail bonds with two sureties, applying Supreme Court principles that presume no flight risk absent concrete evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C / 483 Bnss.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/693/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa granted bail to petitioner Md. Salauddin in a cyber fraud case involving unauthorized linking of a bank account ATM card to his mobile device, citing lack of evidence of actual financial loss and his extended pre-trial detention since November 2025. The court admitted him to bail upon furnishing Rs. 50,000 bail bonds with two sureties, applying Supreme Court principles that presume no flight risk absent concrete evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case