AJAY KUMAR BEHERA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/2599/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010039002026
Filing Number
WP(C)/2152/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2599/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Coram
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )
Sub-Category
ORISSA SURVEY SETTLEMENT ACT 1958 ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJAY KUMAR BEHERA
Adv. SUBASH CHANDRA PUSPALAKA,A.K.TARAI, T.PRIYADARSHINI, S.R.SETHI,,A.K.TARAI, T.PRIYADARSHINI, S.R.SETHI,, A.K.TARAI, T.PRIYADARSHINI, S.R.SETHI,
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER, MAJOR SETTLMENT
-
3.THE ASST. SETTLEMENT OFFICER
-
4.TAHASILDAR, BHUBANESWAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF
The High Court of Orissa set aside the Assistant Settlement Officer's order directing that the petitioner's mother's land be recorded under Government Khata, finding that the authority had rejected the objection case without examining the documents establishing the mother's title. The court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, directing the petitioner to appear before the authority within two weeks with supporting evidence and requiring a decision within six weeks, while clarifying it expressed no opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2599/2026
The High Court of Orissa set aside the Assistant Settlement Officer's order directing that the petitioner's mother's land be recorded under Government Khata, finding that the authority had rejected the objection case without examining the documents establishing the mother's title. The court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, directing the petitioner to appear before the authority within two weeks with supporting evidence and requiring a decision within six weeks, while clarifying it expressed no opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts