THE MANAGER, LEGAL, M/S. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, KHORDHA vs LUCKY PRADHAN — FAO/30/2026
Case under Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Section 30. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010038522026
Filing Number
FAO/2131/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
FAO/30/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice B. P. Routray
Coram
Mr. Justice B. P. Routray
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LABOUR MATTERS ( 18 )
Sub-Category
WORKMEN COMPENSATION ACT ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MANAGER, LEGAL, M/S. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, KHORDHA
Adv. G.P.DUTTA, S.K.MOHANTY, S.R.OJHA, K.M.BHUYAN, CH.T.PRAHARAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.LUCKY PRADHAN
-
2.MANORANJAN SAMAL
Adv. MANAS KUMAR SWAIN,M/S.MANAS KUMAR SWAIN.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF
The High Court of Orissa reduced the workers' compensation award from Rs. 15,59,452/- to Rs. 11,90,000/- in an appeal by Reliance General Insurance Company against an employee compensation order. The claimant-respondent, who sustained an injury while working as a laborer/helper in a truck, agreed to the reduced amount, and the court ordered disbursement within eight weeks with accrued interest, while waiving penalties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
For Hearing U/O.xli.r-11,C.p.c.
Mr. Justice B. P. Routray
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/30/2026
The High Court of Orissa reduced the workers' compensation award from Rs. 15,59,452/- to Rs. 11,90,000/- in an appeal by Reliance General Insurance Company against an employee compensation order. The claimant-respondent, who sustained an injury while working as a laborer/helper in a truck, agreed to the reduced amount, and the court ordered disbursement within eight weeks with accrued interest, while waiving penalties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts