AMITAV NAYAK vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/440/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 21st April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010026122026
Filing Number
BLAPL/1139/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
BLAPL/440/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMITAV NAYAK
Adv. RABINDRA NATH PRUSTY,C.KAR, S.PRUSTY,C.KAR, S.PRUSTY, C.KAR, S.PRUSTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
Summary The High Court of Orissa rejected Amitav Nayak's bail application in a murder case (IPC §302) involving the death of Sudam Nag. The court found that despite the FIR being registered in 2012, the petitioner absconded for 13 years before arrest in December 2025 and was allegedly last seen with the deceased, making the offense serious and the flight risk substantial. Considering the nature and gravity of the allegations and materials on record, the court declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
For Orders - Adjourned Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C./ 483 Bnss
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C / 483 Bnss.
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
26-Feb-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BLAPL/440/2026
Summary The High Court of Orissa rejected Amitav Nayak's bail application in a murder case (IPC §302) involving the death of Sudam Nag. The court found that despite the FIR being registered in 2012, the petitioner absconded for 13 years before arrest in December 2025 and was allegedly last seen with the deceased, making the offense serious and the flight risk substantial. Considering the nature and gravity of the allegations and materials on record, the court declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts