RABINDRA MOHANTY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/1927/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010025072026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1419/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1927/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Coram

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Sub-Category

ORISSA PREVENTION OF LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABINDRA MOHANTY

    Adv. RAJENDRA KUMAR DASH,A.C.BEHERA,A.C.BEHERA, A.C.BEHERA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR AND DIST.MAGISTRATE, BHADRAK

  3. 3.ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHADRAK

  4. 4.SUB COLLECTOR CUM SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, BHADRAK

  5. 5.TAHASILDAR, BHANDARIPOKHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner Rabindra Mohanty to withdraw his writ petition with liberty to approach the appellate forum. The court granted the petitioner 30 days to file an appeal and directed that limitation be considered liberally, with protection from eviction from the case land during this period or until appeal filing, whichever is earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1927/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner Rabindra Mohanty to withdraw his writ petition with liberty to approach the appellate forum. The court granted the petitioner 30 days to file an appeal and directed that limitation be considered liberally, with protection from eviction from the case land during this period or until appeal filing, whichever is earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case