PURNA CHANDRA BIRTIA LAXMI SHARMA, R.SHARMA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/2265/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Dropped on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010023622026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1328/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2265/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Coram
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )
Sub-Category
ORISSA SURVEY SETTLEMENT ACT 1958 ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dropped
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PURNA CHANDRA BIRTIA LAXMI SHARMA, R.SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.TAHASILDAR, BARGARH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage since the underlying Misc. Case No.15/2025 (concerning land record rectification under the Odisha Survey & Settlement Act) was already taken up for hearing before the Tahasildar, Bargarh. The court expressed hope that the Tahasildar would dispose of the matter expeditiously in accordance with law while providing the petitioner due hearing opportunity, without expressing any opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra
-
19-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra
-
12-Feb-2026
Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2265/2026
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage since the underlying Misc. Case No.15/2025 (concerning land record rectification under the Odisha Survey & Settlement Act) was already taken up for hearing before the Tahasildar, Bargarh. The court expressed hope that the Tahasildar would dispose of the matter expeditiously in accordance with law while providing the petitioner due hearing opportunity, without expressing any opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts