DEEPAK SA UMA SHANKAR PATEL, B.K.BARIK, A.PANDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/355/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010022892026

e-Filing Number

09-01-2026

Filing Number

BLAPL/1002/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/355/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK SA UMA SHANKAR PATEL, B.K.BARIK, A.PANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Deepak Sa in a patricide case (U/S. 103(1) BNS) on the grounds that witnesses to his alleged extrajudicial confession did not support the prosecution's allegations, the case relies on circumstantial evidence, and he had been in pre-trial detention since September 2024. He was admitted to bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, subject to attending all trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Adjourned Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/355/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Deepak Sa in a patricide case (U/S. 103(1) BNS) on the grounds that witnesses to his alleged extrajudicial confession did not support the prosecution's allegations, the case relies on circumstantial evidence, and he had been in pre-trial detention since September 2024. He was admitted to bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, subject to attending all trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case