CHANDRA MADHAB SATPATHY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/2455/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: ODHC010020962026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1191/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/2455/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Coram
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )
Sub-Category
ORISSA SURVEY SETTLEMENT ACT 1958 ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRA MADHAB SATPATHY
Adv. BHAWANI SANKAR PANIGRAHI,S.PRADHAN,S.PRADHAN, S.PRADHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.ODISHA FOREST ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE DEPARTMENT ,BHUBANESWAR
-
3.THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, CHANDAKA WILDLIFE DIVISION, BHUBANESWAR
-
4.THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER,CUTTACK
-
5.THE TAHASILDAR,BHUBANESWAR
-
6.THE MEMBER ,BOARD OF REVENUE ,CUTTACK
-
7.THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER, ADDL. REVISIONAL COURT,BHUBNAESWAR
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Orissa adjourned the writ petition (W.P.(C) No.2455 of 2026) and directed the Registry to list the matter in the week commencing 04.05.2026. The petitioner's challenge to the Board of Revenue's decision rejecting his land correction claim requires further consideration, with the court directing the opposite parties to file a counter affidavit by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2455/2026
Case Summary The High Court of Orissa adjourned the writ petition (W.P.(C) No.2455 of 2026) and directed the Registry to list the matter in the week commencing 04.05.2026. The petitioner's challenge to the Board of Revenue's decision rejecting his land correction claim requires further consideration, with the court directing the opposite parties to file a counter affidavit by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts