SIKANDER ALLAM @ SIKANDAR ALAM @ SIKO vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/360/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010019782026
Filing Number
BLAPL/857/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
BLAPL/360/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIKANDER ALLAM @ SIKANDAR ALAM @ SIKO
Adv. SITIKANT MISHRA,S.MOHARANA,S.MOHARANA, S.MOHARANA
-
2.ABDUL MOTALIB KHAN @ ABDUL MOTALIF KHAN @ TIKI @ TIKO
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa heard an application by petitioner Sikander Allam for modification of conditions in a bail petition (BLAPL 360/2026). The court noted a discrepancy: the petitioner's counsel claimed the IO seized the petitioner's passport, while the IO denied seizure despite filing an affidavit. Justice G. Satapathy directed the State counsel to obtain clarification from the concerned IO regarding passport seizure and adjourned the matter to 30.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C.
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
26-Feb-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BLAPL/360/2026
The High Court of Orissa heard an application by petitioner Sikander Allam for modification of conditions in a bail petition (BLAPL 360/2026). The court noted a discrepancy: the petitioner's counsel claimed the IO seized the petitioner's passport, while the IO denied seizure despite filing an affidavit. Justice G. Satapathy directed the State counsel to obtain clarification from the concerned IO regarding passport seizure and adjourned the matter to 30.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts