JAMBU DALEI vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/717/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010010982026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
BLAPL/433/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
BLAPL/717/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAMBU DALEI
Adv. SUSANTA KUMAR LENKA,B.MISHRA, K.MOHAPATRA,B.MISHRA, K.MOHAPATRA, B.MISHRA, K.MOHAPATRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.VICTIM
-
3.S.BEHERA
Adv. SUJIT KUMAR SAHU,M.R.PADHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa granted bail to three petitioners (Jambu Dalei, Mina Dalei, and Babu Nayak) accused of kidnapping and sexual assault under IPC sections 363/120-B/365/109/212 read with POCSO Act Section 17. The court approved their bail after considering that the victim made no allegations against any petitioner in her recorded statement, despite the serious nature of charges, and ordered each to furnish Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with conditions prohibiting contact with the victim and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C / 483 Bnss.
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
11-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BLAPL/717/2026
The High Court of Orissa granted bail to three petitioners (Jambu Dalei, Mina Dalei, and Babu Nayak) accused of kidnapping and sexual assault under IPC sections 363/120-B/365/109/212 read with POCSO Act Section 17. The court approved their bail after considering that the victim made no allegations against any petitioner in her recorded statement, despite the serious nature of charges, and ordered each to furnish Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with conditions prohibiting contact with the victim and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts