ANGEL MISHRA vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/778/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010004032026
Filing Number
BLAPL/167/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
BLAPL/778/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANGEL MISHRA
Adv. DEBASNAN DAS,S.S.PATTNAIK, B.B.SAHOO, S.SATAPATHY, A.PRIYA, B.B.PRADHAN, H.K.TANDI, J.MAJHI,S.S.PATTNAIK, B.B.SAHOO, S.SATAPATHY, A.PRIYA, B.B.PRADHAN, H.K.TANDI, J.MAJHI, S.S.PATTNAIK, B.B.SAHOO, S.SATAPATHY, A.PRIYA, B.B.PRADHAN, H.K.TANDI, J.MAJHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
Case Summary: BLAPL No. 778 of 2026 The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Angel Mishra in a cheating case involving forged documents and Rs. 78 lakh fraud, citing his prolonged pre-trial custody of over two years despite the trial court's failure to provide written reasons for bail rejection under Section 480(6) BNSS. The court emphasized that indefinite incarceration violates Article 21 and noted the absence of any evidence suggesting flight risk, ordering release on property surety of Rs. 5 lakh plus bail bonds with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C / 483 Bnss.
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
12-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BLAPL/778/2026
Case Summary: BLAPL No. 778 of 2026 The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Angel Mishra in a cheating case involving forged documents and Rs. 78 lakh fraud, citing his prolonged pre-trial custody of over two years despite the trial court's failure to provide written reasons for bail rejection under Section 480(6) BNSS. The court emphasized that indefinite incarceration violates Article 21 and noted the absence of any evidence suggesting flight risk, ordering release on property surety of Rs. 5 lakh plus bail bonds with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts