PHILAMON MAWRIE vs LAITUMKHRAH DORBAR SHNONG — CRP/29/2025
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.
CNR: MLHC010018132025
Filing Number
CRP/1359/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
CRP/29/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL REVISIONS ( 16 )
Sub-Category
Civil Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution ( 10244 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PHILAMON MAWRIE
Adv. VGK KYNTA, SR. ADV,M. KYNTA,M. KYNTA, C. NONGKHLAW,H. WANSHONG,G. KYNTA,M. KYNTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAITUMKHRAH DORBAR SHNONG
Adv. D. DAW,N. KHARSYAD,R. KHARSYAD,K.K. PARIAT,M. MAWTHOH,J.K. PARIAT,D. KHONGWIR 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
Summary The High Court of Meghalaya set aside and quashed the District Council Court's order dated 14.11.2025, holding that Rule 31(2) of the Khasi Hills Autonomous District (Administration of Justice) Rules, 1953 confers revisional jurisdiction only in criminal matters, not civil matters. The court found the District Council Court had no authority to entertain a civil revision petition against an injunction order that was appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
17-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
02-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
09-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRP/29/2025
Summary The High Court of Meghalaya set aside and quashed the District Council Court's order dated 14.11.2025, holding that Rule 31(2) of the Khasi Hills Autonomous District (Administration of Justice) Rules, 1953 confers revisional jurisdiction only in criminal matters, not civil matters. The court found the District Council Court had no authority to entertain a civil revision petition against an injunction order that was appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts