BIMLAN SOHSHANG K.V. KHARLYNGDOH, W. BYNNUD,L. SYIEM,K. POHSHNA,S. MYLLIEM,W. DKHAR,B. WANKHAR,W. KHARLYNGIONG,D. MARAK,D. BYNNUD vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA, ,K KHAN, AAG,N SYNGKON, ASST. PP,AH KHARWANLANG, ADDL. PP,JN RYNJAH, GA,BL LYNGKHOI,I LALOO,B KOMI — Crl.Petn./61/2025

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: MLHC010012492025

Filing Number

Crl.Petn./302/2025

Filing Date

08-Sep-2025

Registration No

Crl.Petn./61/2025

Registration Date

08-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL REVISIONS AND OTHER CASES ( 18 )

Sub-Category

Criminal Petition including Criminal cases filed under Section 482 CrPC ( 10271 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIMLAN SOHSHANG K.V. KHARLYNGDOH, W. BYNNUD,L. SYIEM,K. POHSHNA,S. MYLLIEM,W. DKHAR,B. WANKHAR,W. KHARLYNGIONG,D. MARAK,D. BYNNUD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA, ,K KHAN, AAG,N SYNGKON, ASST. PP,AH KHARWANLANG, ADDL. PP,JN RYNJAH, GA,BL LYNGKHOI,I LALOO,B KOMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.Petn. 61/2025 This compliance hearing concerns a criminal petition originally disposed on 16th March 2026. The court directed the petitioner to deposit ₹25,000 as costs into Respondent No. 3's account within four weeks. On 17th April 2026, the High Court of Meghalaya confirmed the petitioner's compliance through filed affidavit evidence, which Respondent No. 3 did not dispute. No further orders were issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief JusticeView PDF

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief JusticeView PDF

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  16. 11-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF

  17. 11-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  18. 11-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  19. 23-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF

  20. 23-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  21. 07-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF

  22. 07-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  23. 10-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF

  24. 10-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 08-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Petn./61/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Petn. 61/2025 This compliance hearing concerns a criminal petition originally disposed on 16th March 2026. The court directed the petitioner to deposit ₹25,000 as costs into Respondent No. 3's account within four weeks. On 17th April 2026, the High Court of Meghalaya confirmed the petitioner's compliance through filed affidavit evidence, which Respondent No. 3 did not dispute. No further orders were issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case