JOHN J.R MARAK DANGGO AND 3 ORS. vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 4 ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA, B SNAITANG,I LYNGWA, GA,B KHARWANLANG,AM PALA, GA — WP(C)/342/2025
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: MLHC010010532025
Filing Number
WP(C)/797/2025
Filing Date
13-Aug-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/342/2025
Registration Date
13-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITION RELATING TO STATE GOVT. EMPLOYEES ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Reservation of vacancies ( 10029 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JOHN J.R MARAK DANGGO AND 3 ORS.
Adv. PHILEMON NONGBRI,I. KHONGMEN,I. KHONGMEN, R. PAHSYNTIEW,E. LALSANGLUAIA,B. IAWIM,B. THABAH,I. KHONGMEN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 4 ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA, B SNAITANG,I LYNGWA, GA,B KHARWANLANG,AM PALA, GA (Government Advocate)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 342/2025 - Marak Danggo v. State of Meghalaya The High Court of Meghalaya disposed of the writ petition filed by four Assistant Inspectors of Excise challenging recruitment advertisement No. 06/2024, which advertised 12 Inspector of Excise posts exclusively for direct recruitment, violating the 50-50 promotion-direct recruitment mandate under Rule 7(1)(c) of the Meghalaya Excise (Subordinate) Service Rules, 2010. The respondents conceded during proceedings and filed an affidavit (dated 19-03-2026) committing to comply with statutory requirements. The court allowed the petition and permitted respondents to recommence recruitment strictly adhering to legal provisions requiring 50% vacancies filled by promotion from eligible Assistant Inspectors and 50% through direct recruitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
16-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
15-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
25-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
04-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
16-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
25-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
10-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
18-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/342/2025
Case Summary: WP(C) 342/2025 - Marak Danggo v. State of Meghalaya The High Court of Meghalaya disposed of the writ petition filed by four Assistant Inspectors of Excise challenging recruitment advertisement No. 06/2024, which advertised 12 Inspector of Excise posts exclusively for direct recruitment, violating the 50-50 promotion-direct recruitment mandate under Rule 7(1)(c) of the Meghalaya Excise (Subordinate) Service Rules, 2010. The respondents conceded during proceedings and filed an affidavit (dated 19-03-2026) committing to comply with statutory requirements. The court allowed the petition and permitted respondents to recommence recruitment strictly adhering to legal provisions requiring 50% vacancies filled by promotion from eligible Assistant Inspectors and 50% through direct recruitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts