ANTHONY SHULLAI vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA — Crl.M.C./100/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: MLHC010009102026

Filing Number

Crl.M.C./301/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

Crl.M.C./100/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANTHONY SHULLAI

    Adv. S. DEY,K. LYTEP,K. LYTEP, M. NAYANG,N. LAMARE,E. DKHAR,S. DEB,K.T. LYNGDOH,J. SUCHIANG,K. LYTEP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. DiengdohView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.C. No. 100/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya condoned a 373-day delay in filing an appeal by Anthony Shullai, who was convicted under the POCSO Act and sentenced to 7 years imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine. The court accepted his explanation that as an uneducated daily laborer unaware of legal procedures and unable to afford counsel, the delay was beyond his control and constituted sufficient cause. The State did not oppose the condonation, and the appeal has been admitted for hearing after one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.M.C./100/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.C. No. 100/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya condoned a 373-day delay in filing an appeal by Anthony Shullai, who was convicted under the POCSO Act and sentenced to 7 years imprisonment with ₹10,000 fine. The court accepted his explanation that as an uneducated daily laborer unaware of legal procedures and unable to afford counsel, the delay was beyond his control and constituted sufficient cause. The State did not oppose the condonation, and the appeal has been admitted for hearing after one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case