NO. ARMC-6000017Y COMDT. (CMO) DR. AJOY KUMAR NATH R CHOUDHURY, N.I CHOUDHURY,RK SHAH,G. PYNGROPE,MD. I.A. MANSURI,EM LAMARE vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - DR. N. MOZIKA, DSG, C JALA,M MYRCHIANG — WP(C)/286/2025

Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: MLHC010008772025

Filing Number

WP(C)/675/2025

Filing Date

08-Jul-2025

Registration No

WP(C)/286/2025

Registration Date

08-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITION RELATING TO SERVICE OF DEFENCE PERSONNEL AND ARMED FORCES ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Other service matters ( 10080 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 23-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NO. ARMC-6000017Y COMDT. (CMO) DR. AJOY KUMAR NATH R CHOUDHURY, N.I CHOUDHURY,RK SHAH,G. PYNGROPE,MD. I.A. MANSURI,EM LAMARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. Advocate - DR. N. MOZIKA, DSG, C JALA,M MYRCHIANG

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

    The writ petition by Comdt. (CMO) Dr. Ajoy Kumar Nath seeking voluntary retirement under CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 was rejected by the Assam Rifles citing shortage of radiologists (only 2 against 4 required). The High Court of Meghalya has directed the respondents to positively consider alternative arrangements and is continuing the matter for further hearing on 03.06.2026, with copies of instructions provided to the petitioner's counsel for response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  14. 10-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  17. 04-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  19. 22-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  20. 22-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  21. 26-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  22. 26-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  23. 11-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  24. 20-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  25. 20-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  26. 29-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  27. 29-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  28. 10-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  29. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 08-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/286/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition by Comdt. (CMO) Dr. Ajoy Kumar Nath seeking voluntary retirement under CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 was rejected by the Assam Rifles citing shortage of radiologists (only 2 against 4 required). The High Court of Meghalya has directed the respondents to positively consider alternative arrangements and is continuing the matter for further hearing on 03.06.2026, with copies of instructions provided to the petitioner's counsel for response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case