ADRAIN KHARMYNDAI AND ANR. I. WARJRI, K. SYIEMLIEH,R. PAUL vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA, S SENGUPTA, ADDL. PP,H KHARMIH, ADDL. PP — Crl.Petn./75/2026
Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CNR: MLHC010008752026
Filing Number
Crl.Petn./293/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
Crl.Petn./75/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL REVISIONS AND OTHER CASES ( 18 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Petition including Criminal cases filed under Section 482 CrPC ( 10271 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ADRAIN KHARMYNDAI AND ANR. I. WARJRI, K. SYIEMLIEH,R. PAUL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MEGHALAYA Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA, S SENGUPTA, ADDL. PP,H KHARMIH, ADDL. PP (Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jul-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief JusticeView PDF
Summary of Crl.Petn. No. 75/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya adjourned the petition seeking quashing of a POCSO FIR. The petitioners (accused aged 19, prosecutrix aged 16 at incident; now 22 and 20 respectively) sought quashing by consent, claiming consensual relationship and having a 3½-year-old child together. The Court directed parties to appear before the High Court Legal Committee Secretary within two weeks for a report on whether consent was informed and welfare benefits received. The case stands adjourned to 6th July 2026, with proceedings before the Special Judge POCSO stayed meanwhile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.Petn./75/2026
Summary of Crl.Petn. No. 75/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya adjourned the petition seeking quashing of a POCSO FIR. The petitioners (accused aged 19, prosecutrix aged 16 at incident; now 22 and 20 respectively) sought quashing by consent, claiming consensual relationship and having a 3½-year-old child together. The Court directed parties to appear before the High Court Legal Committee Secretary within two weeks for a report on whether consent was informed and welfare benefits received. The case stands adjourned to 6th July 2026, with proceedings before the Special Judge POCSO stayed meanwhile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts