SAPAN CHAKMA S. PANDIT, S.D SANGMA,T.A SANGMA,N. CHYMANG,S.A PANDIT vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA — BA/31/2026
Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: MLHC010008512026
Filing Number
BA/286/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
BA/31/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL REVISIONS AND OTHER CASES ( 18 )
Sub-Category
Bail Application under Section 439 Cr.P.C ( 10266 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAPAN CHAKMA S. PANDIT, S.D SANGMA,T.A SANGMA,N. CHYMANG,S.A PANDIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. DiengdohView PDF
Case Summary: In BA No. 31/2026, Sapan Chakma's second bail application was heard by Justice W. Diengdoh. The petitioner challenged the arrest on grounds that proper intimation was not given. The court adjourned the matter for two weeks, directing the State to produce the case diary for examination before the next hearing. No final bail order was passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/31/2026
Case Summary: In BA No. 31/2026, Sapan Chakma's second bail application was heard by Justice W. Diengdoh. The petitioner challenged the arrest on grounds that proper intimation was not given. The court adjourned the matter for two weeks, directing the State to produce the case diary for examination before the next hearing. No final bail order was passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts