M/S ARJUN NONGRUM M.L. NONGPIUR, A KSOO,T. SUTNGA vs FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WP(C)/235/2026
Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: MLHC010008452026
Filing Number
WP(C)/559/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/235/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 10 )
Sub-Category
Other Civil Rules ( 10189 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S ARJUN NONGRUM M.L. NONGPIUR, A KSOO,T. SUTNGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 235/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya admitted the writ petition by M/s Arjun Nongrum challenging the Food Corporation of India's contract cancellation order dated 19-12-2025 for foodgrain handling and transportation from Mendipathar to Nongstoin, along with the consequential blacklisting, alleging denial of opportunity to be heard. The court allowed respondents to file an affidavit and granted interim relief by prohibiting coercive action against the petitioner until the next hearing on 19-06-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/235/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 235/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya admitted the writ petition by M/s Arjun Nongrum challenging the Food Corporation of India's contract cancellation order dated 19-12-2025 for foodgrain handling and transportation from Mendipathar to Nongstoin, along with the consequential blacklisting, alleging denial of opportunity to be heard. The court allowed respondents to file an affidavit and granted interim relief by prohibiting coercive action against the petitioner until the next hearing on 19-06-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts