M/S PERFECT STAMPING PVT LTD. P. GHOSH, L. MAJAW,N. UPADHYAY,N.M. KHARSHEMLANG vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Advocate - DR. N. MOZIKA, DSG — WP(C)/230/2026

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: MLHC010008322026

Filing Number

WP(C)/546/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/230/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 10 )

Sub-Category

Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentality ( 10180 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S PERFECT STAMPING PVT LTD. P. GHOSH, L. MAJAW,N. UPADHYAY,N.M. KHARSHEMLANG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Advocate - DR. N. MOZIKA, DSG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 230/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya dismissed Perfect Stamping Pvt. Ltd.'s writ petition challenging the rejection of its kitchen utensils supply bids to Assam Rifles on a procedural ground. The court found that the petitioner challenged three separate bids with different rejection reasons in a single petition, which cannot sustain multiple distinct causes of action. The court noted the respondents had provided written reasons for rejection and given the petitioner 48 hours to rectify deficiencies, which were not availed of. Liberty was granted to file separate petitions for each bid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/230/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 230/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya dismissed Perfect Stamping Pvt. Ltd.'s writ petition challenging the rejection of its kitchen utensils supply bids to Assam Rifles on a procedural ground. The court found that the petitioner challenged three separate bids with different rejection reasons in a single petition, which cannot sustain multiple distinct causes of action. The court noted the respondents had provided written reasons for rejection and given the petitioner 48 hours to rectify deficiencies, which were not availed of. Liberty was granted to file separate petitions for each bid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case