MARVELLOUS DKHAR vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA — Crl.Petn./70/2026

Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Next hearing 06-Jul-2026

CNR: MLHC010008232026

Filing Number

Crl.Petn./281/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

Crl.Petn./70/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL REVISIONS AND OTHER CASES ( 18 )

Sub-Category

Criminal Petition including Criminal cases filed under Section 482 CrPC ( 10271 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARVELLOUS DKHAR

    Adv. SP MAHANTA, SR. ADV,S.E. KHARBUKI,S.E. KHARBUKI, L.P. WAR,L.D.N. THANGKHIEW,D. DKHAR,S.E. KHARBUKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jul-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.Petn. No. 70/2026 Marvellous Dkhar filed a petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings against him, claiming his relationship with the prosecutrix (Respondent No. 5) was consensual and that they are living together with a child. The High Court of Meghalaya granted leave to amend the petition to anonymize Respondent No. 6 (the prosecutrix's mother). Notice was issued to respondents returnable by 6th July 2026, and the trial court proceedings were stayed pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Petn./70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Petn. No. 70/2026 Marvellous Dkhar filed a petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings against him, claiming his relationship with the prosecutrix (Respondent No. 5) was consensual and that they are living together with a child. The High Court of Meghalaya granted leave to amend the petition to anonymize Respondent No. 6 (the prosecutrix's mother). Notice was issued to respondents returnable by 6th July 2026, and the trial court proceedings were stayed pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case