M/S NAVSHEEN ASSOCIATES vs CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION LTD. (NPCC) AND ANR. Advocate - DR. N. MOZIKA, DSG — Arb.A./6/2026
Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CNR: MLHC010007922026
Filing Number
Arb.A./515/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
Arb.A./6/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL REVISIONS ( 16 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration Cases ( 10247 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S NAVSHEEN ASSOCIATES
Adv. P.D.B BARUAH, SR. ADV,D.L. MARSHILONG,D.L. MARSHILONG, D.M. RANI,R.P.N. MARAK,B.A. WANSWETT,D.L. MARSHILONG
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION LTD. (NPCC) AND ANR. Advocate - DR. N. MOZIKA, DSG
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jul-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice W. DiengdohView PDF
Case Summary: Arb.A./6/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya issued notice to respondents returnable on 8th July 2026 in the arbitration appeal filed by M/s Navsheen Associates against NPCC's Chairman & Managing Director. Respondent No.2 waived notice, and the appellant was directed to serve Respondent No.1 privately and file an affidavit of service. The court granted liberty to file additional documents as placed before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Arb.A./6/2026
Case Summary: Arb.A./6/2026 The High Court of Meghalaya issued notice to respondents returnable on 8th July 2026 in the arbitration appeal filed by M/s Navsheen Associates against NPCC's Chairman & Managing Director. Respondent No.2 waived notice, and the appellant was directed to serve Respondent No.1 privately and file an affidavit of service. The court granted liberty to file additional documents as placed before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts