M/S NAVSHEEN ASSOCIATES vs CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION LTD. (NPCC) AND ANR. Advocate - DR. N. MOZIKA, DSG — Arb.A./2/2026

Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

CNR: MLHC010007882026

Filing Number

Arb.A./511/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

Arb.A./2/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CIVIL REVISIONS ( 16 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration Cases ( 10247 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S NAVSHEEN ASSOCIATES

    Adv. P.D.B BARUAH, SR. ADV,B.A. WANSWETT,B.A. WANSWETT, D.M. RANI,D.L. MARSHILONG,R.P.N. MARAK,B.A. WANSWETT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION LTD. (NPCC) AND ANR. Advocate - DR. N. MOZIKA, DSG

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jul-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice W. DiengdohView PDF

    The case was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 8th July 2026, with Respondent No. 2 waiving notice. The appellant was directed to serve Respondent No. 1 privately and file an affidavit of service before the next date. Liberty was granted to the appellant to file additional documents with advance copies to respondents' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Arb.A./2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 8th July 2026, with Respondent No. 2 waiving notice. The appellant was directed to serve Respondent No. 1 privately and file an affidavit of service before the next date. Liberty was granted to the appellant to file additional documents with advance copies to respondents' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case