SANDARSING WAHLANG P AGARWAL, LAC vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA, E R CHYNE,A H KHARWANLANG, ADDL. PP — Crl.A./53/2026
Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: MLHC010007862026
Filing Number
Crl.A./272/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
Crl.A./53/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEALS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
Appeals against conviction under other Acts ( 10253 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDARSING WAHLANG P AGARWAL, LAC
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA, E R CHYNE,A H KHARWANLANG, ADDL. PP (Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh,hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 53/2026 Sandarsing Wahlang v. State of Meghalaya & Anr (High Court of Meghalaya, 01.06.2026) The criminal appeal against the Sessions Judge's conviction and sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment with Rs. 3,000 fine (or 1 month simple imprisonment in default) was admitted by the High Court. Trial court records were called for, and the matter was adjourned for three weeks for preparation of the paper book and further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A./53/2026
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 53/2026 Sandarsing Wahlang v. State of Meghalaya & Anr (High Court of Meghalaya, 01.06.2026) The criminal appeal against the Sessions Judge's conviction and sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment with Rs. 3,000 fine (or 1 month simple imprisonment in default) was admitted by the High Court. Trial court records were called for, and the matter was adjourned for three weeks for preparation of the paper book and further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts