RAJIB AHMED LASKAR A.M. BARBHUIYA, R HOQUE vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA, S KH NONGRUM, GA,I LYNGWA, ADDL. PP — Crl.Petn./55/2026

Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: MLHC010007162026

Filing Number

Crl.Petn./245/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

Crl.Petn./55/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL REVISIONS AND OTHER CASES ( 18 )

Sub-Category

Criminal Petition including Criminal cases filed under Section 482 CrPC ( 10271 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIB AHMED LASKAR A.M. BARBHUIYA, R HOQUE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA, S KH NONGRUM, GA,I LYNGWA, ADDL. PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice

  3. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Petition No. 55/2026 filed by Rajib Ahmed Laskar against The State of Meghalaya was adjourned by the High Court of Meghalaya on 19.05.2026. The case has been stood over to 9th June 2026, with the Public Prosecutor directed to take instructions in the interim. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Petn./55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Petition No. 55/2026 filed by Rajib Ahmed Laskar against The State of Meghalaya was adjourned by the High Court of Meghalaya on 19.05.2026. The case has been stood over to 9th June 2026, with the Public Prosecutor directed to take instructions in the interim. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case