DASHISHA PARIONG P. DEY, S.R. MARAK,B. SUN vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA, OAI BANG, GA — BA/26/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: MLHC010006912026

Filing Number

BA/235/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

BA/26/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL REVISIONS AND OTHER CASES ( 18 )

Sub-Category

Bail Application under Section 439 Cr.P.C ( 10266 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DASHISHA PARIONG P. DEY, S.R. MARAK,B. SUN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA, OAI BANG, GA (Government Advocate)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. DiengdohView PDF

    Case Summary: BA No. 26 of 2026 The Meghalaya High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO Act case involving a consensual relationship between two young people that resulted in pregnancy and childbirth. The court found that since the survivor and her mother consented to the petition, the State raised no strong objections, the case had proceeded to trial with the survivor having already testified, continued custody was unwarranted. The accused was released on bail with conditions including a ₹20,000 personal bond, non-absconding undertaking, and jurisdictional restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh

  4. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. DiengdohView PDF

  5. 11-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA No. 26 of 2026 The Meghalaya High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO Act case involving a consensual relationship between two young people that resulted in pregnancy and childbirth. The court found that since the survivor and her mother consented to the petition, the State raised no strong objections, the case had proceeded to trial with the survivor having already testified, continued custody was unwarranted. The accused was released on bail with conditions including a ₹20,000 personal bond, non-absconding undertaking, and jurisdictional restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case